International Taiwan Seminar

Lut Lams (BCJS) gave a talk at the International Taiwan Seminar in the framework of the Taiwanese Studies Chair and the Metaforum Lecture Series, Faculty of social Sciences, KU Leuven. Her discussion of the media ecology and performance in Taiwan started with a historical overview of the role of the media in shaping Taiwan domestic politics, from the authoritarian era of the one-party KMT rule, over the political transformation and the democratization period to present-day Taiwan.

In the second part of the talk, she discussed media reform measures since the democratization of the early 1990s and also pointed out some areas of concern about media performance since 2008. The audience was offered a comprehensive picture of the Taiwanese media landscape in its various facets, both from a historical and contemporary perspective, looking at developments on the domestic and the regional level, including the enhanced dynamic interaction with China.

Advertenties

Succesful international seminar on Indian media and politics @ BCJS

On the 26th of March, the Brussels Center for Journalism Studies, Metaforum and the Faculty of Social Sciences of KU Leuven organized a well-attended international seminar on the role of media in the upcoming Indian federal elections of April and May 2019. A diverse audience of students, academics, journalists and activists attended the seminar at our Brussels campus, where 5 speakers highlighted various aspects of the relationship between media and politics.

Vibodh Parthasarathi, resident fellow Metaforum, explained how the political ownership of media is deeply ingrained in Indian society. He focused on the limits this poses to the diversity of opinions and views in the Indian democracy. Clea Chakraverty, journalist at The Conversation, spoke about French journalists and correspondents reporting Indian elections, and their lack of knowledge and means to create longer in-depth stories. Floris Van Straaten, journalist at NRC Handelsblad, highlighted the subtle manners in which Indian governments try to exercise a certain degree of control on foreign journalists. Britta Ohm, visiting fellow at IIS Leiden, talked about the social media policy of P.M. Modi and its limits. Finally, Chris Verschooten of BCJS, focused on Indian female reporters, and how they develop their own strategies and networks to cover the elections.

 

Deze slideshow heeft JavaScript nodig.

The audience showed their interest by asking a lot of questions, which lead to an interesting exchange of ideas. To conclude with one of the participants’ appreciation: ‘ It was even more interesting than I had anticipated, well attended, with first-hand information from both journalists and academics’.

International seminar : Media as the battleground for politics: Indian elections 2019

Metaforum – Faculty of Social Sciences –
Brussels Center for Journalism Studies

International seminar:

Media as the battleground for politics: Indian elections 2019

Tuesday 26^th March 2019

Programme

13.00 hr             Registration; Snacks and informal discussions

13.45 hr             Welcome and introduction

Leen d’Haenens, Institute for Media Studies KU Leuven

13.55 hr             Media and politics: Who owns whom?

Vibodh Parthasarathi, visiting fellow KU Leuven

14.10 hr             Linking the dots and silences: French reportage of elections

Clea Chakraverty, journalist and editor of The Conversation

14.25 hr             An attempt at control: the Indian government and foreign media

Floris Van Straaten, journalist and Asia-editor of NRC Handelsblad

14.45 hr             (Im)mediated fascism and its limits

Britta Ohm, visiting fellow IIAS, Leiden

15.00 hr             On a bumpy road: Female reporters covering elections

Chris Verschooten, Brussels Center for Journalism Studies, KU Leuven

15.15 hr             Commentary by the panelists

15.35 hr             Public discussion

16.00 hr             Closing of the seminar by Leen d’Haenens

 

Location: KU Leuven Campus Brussels, Hermesbuilding, room 6306, Stormstraat 2, 1000 Brussels

Participation is free, but please register at chris.verschooten@kuleuven.be

Celebrating 10 years BCJS: Looking forward: What can constructive journalism do for us?

The Brussels Center for Journalism Studies celebrated its 10^th anniversary by organizing a festive evening lecture on constructive journalism. After a warm welcome by the director of the center, prof Rozane De Cock, BCJS member prof Hedwig de Smaele started to unravel the central concept of the evening by “deconstructing constructive journalism”. She reflected on the Flemish point of view and presented results of her research on the public broadcasting channel as a case study.

Deze slideshow heeft JavaScript nodig.

Two Flemish journalists/documentary makers, Tom Mahy and Anthony Bosschem, shared their own approach with us by showing fragments of their in-depth reporting style. They started their own online platform “Zwijgen Is Geen Optie: ZIGO” (“Remaining Silent Is No Option”) from scratch to take a stance and to focus on what can be done about societal problems, inspired by interviewees and their positive approach.

Keynote speaker of the evening was prof Liesbeth Hermans, the only academic expert in constructive journalism in the Low Countries. Her talk revolved around potential building blocks of truly future proof journalism and how constructive journalism can contribute to this aim.

Campus dean of the Faculty of Arts at our Brussels Campus, prof Lieven Buysse had the honor to wrap up the central messages of the different lectures by presenting his concluding remarks and by inviting all guests for the festive reception at the foyer.

We want to thank all presenters, journalists, students, former students and colleagues from Brussels and Leuven who were present for their contribution to a wonderful inspiring evening and celebration!

Faceless: visual representation of overweight people in Flemish and Dutch online newspapers

Ilya Lisser and BCJS member Hedwig de Smaele will present their study on the visual representation of overweight people at the Etmaal voor de Communicatiewetenschap conference at the University of Nijmegen (The Netherlands) on the 7^th and 8^th of February 2019.

The worldwide prevalence of obesity has increased significantly throughout the past decades. According to The World Health Organization obesity-rates tripled between 1975 and 2016 . This so-called “obesity epidemic” resulted in a rise of media coverage on the subject as well. In the USA, for example, the media attention for obesity has quintupled between 1985 and 2003.

The media attention, in its turn, influences the audience’s opinions about obesity. By explaining the causes, effects and solutions to obesity, the media shape the framework in which the topic is discussed. Despite the large amount of publications about the rising obesity rates, studies on framing obesity are lagging behind.

Two observations can be made. First, framing studies focus mainly on the USA with less attention to European countries. Second, the visual aspect of news coverage of obesity is largely neglected.

This study wants to meet these two observations. It entails a quantitative visual content analysis to examine the way how overweight people are portrayed in online newspaper photos in the Netherlands and Flanders (Belgium).
Six major Dutch-speaking newspaper websites have been selected during a two-year period (2016-2017). Three newspapers are from the Netherlands (NRC Handelsblad, De Volkskrant, De Telegraaf) and three are from Flanders (De Standaard, De Morgen, Het Nieuwsblad). All images accompanying online articles about obesity that contain individuals were selected. In total, 272 pictures were collected, containing 430 individuals. By use of the “figure rating scale” by Pulvers et al. (2004), the weight of those 430 individuals was determined and systematically coded by the use of a codebook.
The portrayal of overweight people in media coverage of obesity was compared to the portrayal of non-overweight individuals, especially on those criteria that are decisive to stigmatization. Overall, we found that 68 % of the obese/overweight people were depicted in a stigmatizing way. Their heads were more likely to be cut out of the image, they were more often dressed sloppily and they were more frequently portrayed with only their lower body (focus on belly and buttocks) in comparison with non-overweight people. Furthermore, obese/overweight individuals were less likely to be shown in professional clothing or exercising than were non-overweight people. Instead, they were more often associated with passive behavior or medical environments (as patients). (picture: adaptation of joemias/pixabay_free pictures)

WHEN APPLE MEETS DARWIN. How journalism students look to the future of journalism

BCJS member Hedwig de Smaele will present her work on the future of journalism at the annual MeCCSA conference (Media, Communication and Cultural Studies Association) at the University of Stirling in Scotland, at the beginning of January 2019.

The future of journalism is pre-eminently described in terms of change (transformation,  disruption) rather than continuity. Change causes uncertainty; one way to deal with this is to “imagine” possible future scenarios.

In 2015, the Dutch Journalism Fund presented four scenarios for the future of Dutch journalism in 2025. They differ from each other to the extent that they embrace technology and to the degree of trust in institutions.

We analyzed how master students in journalism (“tomorrow’s journalists”) look at them: Which scenario for the future is found the most likely? Which scenario is the most desirable? And why?

In November 2017, 27 students wrote a blog essay about the future of journalism. The essays were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. In November 2018, the study will be repeated with a second group of  students.

The first results show that students consider the future in terms of continuity rather than change. The present and the future of journalism are equally discussed in most essays and are sometimes even equated. The most likely scenario (A Handful of Apples) is one in which only a few tech giants (e.g., Google, Facebook) become the main news sources for passive consumers. The most desirable scenario (Darwin’s Game), however, is a world in which the professional news media maintain a leading role, admittedly with more attention to the public then is now the case. Scenarios that opt for a thorough do-it-yourself mentality (Wisdom of the Crowd, The Shire), students do not consider as likely or desirable.

Celebration 10 years BCJS

Lecture night on constructive journalism followed by drink and reception

Looking positive towards the future

Thursday, 6^th of December 2018

Programme:

18.30-18.40 Welcome and introduction by director BCJS – prof. dr. Rozane De Cock

18.40-19.00 Deconstruction of constructive journalism. Case: VRT– prof. dr. Hedwig de Smaele

19.00-19.30 Founders of news site “Zwijgen is geen optie”. – Dhr. Tom Mahy en Anthony Bosschem

19.30-20.15 Keynote speaker: Building blocks for futureproof journalism  – prof. dr. Liesbeth Hermans, lector Constructive Journalism, Windesheim Nederland

20.15 Drink and reception at the foyer

You are most welcome after confirming your attendance to rozane.decock@kuleuven.be

Profile of news avoiders

ECREA Conference Lugano

The profile of news avoiders, their motives and the potential of constructive journalism as inverting factor.

At the beginning of November, Rozane De Cock presented the results of the research she conducted together with Joris Becq and Hedwig de Smaele on news avoiders and the potential of constructive journalism to reverse this avoidance behavior. News consumption patterns are changing fundamentally due to digital and mobile possibilities (Newman et al., 2016).

 

 

Digital media have increased the amount of available information along with a stretched media choice, but this increase in news supply does not necessarily result in increasing use (Strömbäck, 2017).

 

Strömbäck points out that the transition from low- to high-choice media environments has led to the likelihood that “people who are not interested in news are incidentally exposed to news might have declined”. This could result in what Van den Bulck (2006) calls “unintentional news avoidance”. The study of Schofield Clark and Marchi (2017) shows that young people are by-passing traditional news organizations in the way they share news with each other. Audiences as minority groups and youngsters often feel misrepresented by mainstream news media, turn to alternative sources or lose their interest in news. This could be seen as “intentional news avoiding” and has serious implications for news organizations. Seen from a democratic ‘news leads to informed citizens’ angle, this shift away from news is “cause for concern if considerable numbers of citizens seem to be disconnected from the news” (Schroder & Blach-Orsten, 2016, s.p.).

In this study, we explicitly link the potential of constructive journalism with news avoiding motives. Precisely the focus of constructive journalism (Gyldensted, 2011; McIntyre, 2015) on possible solutions and alternatives for the problems touched upon in the news and progress or lessons learned for the future could function as clear answers to the complaints and motives of news avoidance.

Chinese Media in a New Era of Disruption

For this BCJS event, co-organized by the Brussels Center for Chinese Discourse Studies, Lut Lams invited two China experts to share their views on contemporary Chinese official discourse on the role of the media. First, David Bandurski, co-director of the China Media Project, University of Hong Kong, presented a chronological survey of continuities and changes in the Chinese official media policies since Chairman Mao came to power. Drawing on his years of experience observing Chinese political and media affairs and a great eloquence, Bandurski positioned contemporary Chinese state-media connections within a broad historical context and offered the audience a fascinating insight into the cyclical nature of disruptions of the ‘normal’ in the Chinese political and media scene. We learned about the recurrent alternations between periods of opening the media to a critical ‘People spirit’ and eras of imposing an ideological Party stance onto the media (‘Party spirit’). Spiced with rich illustrations and quotes from the past, the lecture reminded the audience that the ‘new’ or the ‘modern’ always carries an echo of the past. This presentation was followed by an in-depth interview of David Bandurski by the Belgian Sinologist-author-journalist Catherine Vuylsteke, who opened up the discussion into the wider area of Chinese political guidance of public opinion. The event was closed with some keen observations and questions from the public. (25^th of October 2018)